Comment

Councilmember Grosso, Councilmember Wells, Washington Area Bicyclists Association and All Walks DC to hold joint press conference to push for Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Thursday, November 6 at 10am

WASHINGTON, DC— On Friday, November 7, the Committee on the Judiciary & Public Safety will hold a mark-up and vote on B20-884, the “Bicycle and Motor Vehicle Collision Recovery Amendment Act of 2014,” which would remove the harsh and antiquated system of contributory negligence for pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable roadway users who are injured in collisions with motor vehicles. The introduced bill is available here.

 “Pedestrians and bicyclists injured in a crash with a motor vehicle are frequently barred from recovering damages to pay for associated medical bills and damaged property,” said Councilmember Tommy Wells. “The District of Columbia and four other states are the only remaining jurisdictions in the nation with this outdated and unjust negligence standard. I am proud that we are finally taking the steps to change this unfair law.”

“Fairness, safety and equity are the basic principles of this legislation,” said At-Large Councilmember David Grosso who co-introduced the bill with Councilmembers Wells and Cheh. “Based on the testimony we received during the September hearing, the Committee was able to expand the bill to include vulnerable users from pedestrians, cyclists, those in wheelchairs and others.  This amendment significantly enhances the bill, adding a needed layer of protection for those residents who rely on alternate means of transportation to get around the city.”

The Committee worked with the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, the Washington Area Bicyclist Association (WABA), the Pedestrian Advisory Council (PAC), and All Walks DC to help craft the bill. “It is well past time for DC to join the majority of states in bringing fairness to the legal system for vulnerable roadway users, including bicyclists and pedestrians,” says Shane Farthing, WABA executive director. “The victim-blaming contributory negligence doctrine prevents blocks access to justice for people hoping to recover from roadway crashes and injuries. As bicycling continues to grow in the city, we count on our elected officials to make the necessary legal changes to protect people who bike, and we look forward the passage of this bill.”

"All Walks DC calls upon our elected representatives to make a stand against the legal status quo that protects drivers and insurance companies at the expense of pedestrians,” said Tracy Loh of All Walks DC. “This bill is an opportunity to not only make DC safer, but improve access to real justice for pedestrians who suffer traffic conflicts in our great walking city."

"The Pedestrian Advisory Council advises the Mayor and Council, and in this role we voted to recommend that pedestrians be included in the bill and testified to this at the September hearing," said PAC Chair Jason Broehm. "We're pleased that the bill was amended to do this."

To rally support for the bill, Councilmembers Wells and David Grosso will hold a joint press conference on Thursday, November 6 at 10:00am in Room 123 of the John A. Wilson Building. Wells and Grosso will be joined by All Walks DC and the Washington Area Bicyclist Association which will unveil its official voting record scorecard for DC Councilmembers. B20-884 is the first bill on which Councilmembers’ votes will be graded.

 

PRESS CONFERENCE DETAILS

WHAT:                   Joint Press Conference

WHO:                     DC Councilmember Tommy Wells, DC Councilmember David Grosso, Washington Area Bicyclists Association (WABA), All Walks DC.

DATE:                     Thursday, November 6, 2014

TIME:                      10:00am

WHERE:                  Room 123

                                John A. Wilson Building

                                1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

                                Washington, DC 20004

 

 Both Councilmembers will be available for questions immediately following the presentation

 

###

 

Comment

Comment

Politics and Arts: A Jam Session in the Wilson Building

Please join me and the Washington Performing Arts on Wednesday, November 19 from 6 p.m. - 9 p.m. as we host "Politics and Arts: A Jam Session in the Wilson Building."  The event will showcase local musicians and also provide musicians from different genres and backgrounds with an opportunity to network and share their own passion for the arts. Special performances of the night will include SynchroniCity, Roof Beams, and for an added bonus a dance selection by SerendibDance.  

This spectacular event will be the third in a series of arts events that I have hosted. The events are used as an opportunity to showcase the thriving arts community and also serve as a continuing effort to provide community engagement opportunities at the John A. Wilson Building.  Prior events have been held in my office but I wanted to expand the event to welcome the arts community and members and staff of the D.C. Council.  The event will be held on the first floor of the John A. Wilson Building (foyer) and will consist of a "mix and mingle" with light refreshments followed by a program with local musicians.

My last event, an "Evening of Poetry" showcased D.C.'s artistic youth with selections from the D.C. Scores, Free Minds and the D.C. Youth Slam Team who won first place at the Brave New Voices youth poetry slam contest. To see a recap of the event, click here.

For more information, please contact my office at (202) 724-8105.

Comment

Comment

Legal marijuana could be $130 million a year business in D.C., study finds

By Mike DeBonis October 30, 2014, Washington Post

If D.C. residents vote to legalize marijuana possession next week, it wouldn’t just mean a sea change in drug policy in the nation’s capital. It could also mean big business.

A study by District financial officials shared Thursday with lawmakers estimates a legal D.C. cannabis market worth $130 million a year.

The ballot initiative voters will see Tuesday does not allow for the legal sale of marijuana — only the possession and home cultivation of small amounts — but D.C. Council members gathered Thursday to hear testimony about what a legal sales regime might look like.

The issues pondered included how marijuana might be grown, tracked, sold and taxed, but more than a few witnesses showed up simply to cheer on or warn against the general notion of legalization.

Council member Vincent B. Orange (D-At Large) repeatedly reminded them that the legalization question lies in the hands of voters — who, according to several polls taken in recent months, are expected to endorse the measure.

View GraphicThe status of marijuana laws across the nation.

The passage of Initiative 71 would “still . . . not give us the justification for sales and commercialization of marijuana,” said Will Jones III, a D.C. resident who leads a group opposing the initiative.

But Orange and his colleagues were determined to start working out the logistics of creating a legitimate cannabis industry in Washington — even as they remain wary of potential congressional intervention, which could stamp out the legalization effort before it takes effect.

Testimony prepared by city financial officials pegged the potential size of the market at $130 million a year, based on an estimate of 122,000 users, including residents, commuters and tourists, each consuming three ounces of marijuana costing an average of $350 per ounce.

An initial version of a marijuana regulation bill before the council sets a sales tax of 15 percent, suggesting potential government revenue of nearly $20 million a year. A system of legal marijuana sales would also come with considerable costs to the District government, the testimony indicated, requiring the hiring of up to a dozen additional employees and the purchase of new systems and equipment.

The financial official who testified, Yesim Sayin Taylor, said it is difficult at this point to estimate the city’s exact revenue or costs, citing the unfinished nature of the regulatory legislation and the difficulty of determining how many current marijuana users will migrate from the black market to legal, taxed purchases.

One expert, Joseph Henchman of the Tax Foundation, warned council members against setting tax rates so high that marijuana users would stick with lower-priced black-market cannabis.

“Colorado and Washington picked tax rates that are still too high,” he said. “The black market still exists . . . and the black market prices are lower.”

Two Brookings Institution fellows who had studied the legalization programs in Colorado and Washington urged D.C. officials to learn from the experiences in those states. One, John Hudak, urged members to have “listening tours” in the community — hearing from, among others, those engaged in the underground marijuana economy.

“They are efficient. They are innovative. They are effective businessmen and women,” he said.

The regulatory bill currently under consideration, drafted by David Grosso (I-At Large), would tax recreational sales at 15 percent and send those proceeds, along with fees paid by cultivators and retailers, to a variety of agencies and programs, including police training, youth programs and efforts to combat substance abuse. The District’s alcohol regulators would oversee marijuana sales.

Fred Moosally, director of the Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration, called the bill “ a good start” but suggested tightening several measures to conform with guidance issued last year by the Justice Department on local marijuana programs — particularly adding measures to keep drugs out of the hands of those younger than 21 and to prevent the import or export of marijuana across state lines.

Grosso said Thursday he has already rewritten his bill in response to public input, including dropping plans to end the city’s medical marijuana program and focusing the revenue more squarely on youth programs and prevention efforts.

“It is time for the District of Columbia to step up and address this issue in a thoughtful and measured way,” he said.

Given the complexity of writing and implementing regulations, Taylor said, no city revenue is expected before late 2016. Moosally declined to estimate when the first retail sales could take place. “We recognize this is a time-sensitive issue,” he said. “But at the same time, we have to get this right.”

Comment

Comment

Grosso Announces Formation of Diverse, City-wide Arts and Creative Economy Coalition

For Immediate Release

October 30, 2014

Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

(202) 724-8105


Grosso Announces Formation of Diverse, City-wide Arts and Creative Economy Coalition


Washington, DC -- Today, Councilmember David Grosso (I - At Large) is pleased to announce the formation of ArtsAction DC: Strengthening Our Creative Community, a coalition of 40 organizations representing performing and visual arts and the creative economy.  Grosso works with the group who meets monthly at Arena Stage.

“One of my highest priorities since I was elected to the Council is to bring together organizations from around the city to advocate with one voice on behalf of the arts and the creative economy.  I am delighted to announce that those organizations have come together to form ArtsAction DC, which will advocate on behalf of funding, support, and growth of the arts and arts education in D.C.,” Grosso said.

ArtsAction DC comprises a diverse group of organizations, both large and small, that drive the creative economy sector in Washington D.C., including: theater, dance, visual art, written and spoken word, music, fashion, film, and festivals. 

The group is developing a study entitled “Funding for a Cultural Plan for DC,” which the group intends to release prior to the FY16 Budget process next year with the goal of making the case for increased funding for the arts in D.C.

“ArtsAction, DC will be an indispensable voice for the arts and the creative economy in DC,” said Grosso.  “I am delighted that so many organizations from disparate arts disciplines have come together to advance the common goal of critical support for the arts.  I look forward to working with my colleagues to continue to work with this dynamic group in the months and years ahead.”


Learn more about ArtsAction DC here: www.artsactiondc.org, Twitter, and Facebook.

The members of ArtsAction are:

Anacostia Playhouse

America for the Arts

Atlas Performing Arts Center

Arena Stage

ArentFox

Artomatic, Inc.

Beltway Poetry Slam

Capital Fringe

Center for the Creative Economy

CityDance

CulturalDC

Dance Place

DC Fashion Foundation

DC Shorts

Dupont Underground

(e)merge art fair

Folger Shakespeare Library

Ford's Theater

GALA

Gay Mens Chorus

Idea Plex/Studio 202

Molotov

Listen Local First

Pen Faulkner Foundation

Phillips Collection

Shakespeare Theater

Split This Rock

Step Afrika!

Studio Theater

Taffety Punk

THEARC

Theatre Alliance

Theatre J

Ward 8 Cultural Council

Washington Performing Arts

Washington Bach Consort

The Washington Ballet

Woolly Mammoth Theatre 


###

Comment

Comment

Grosso’s opening remarks from hearing on amendments to the Small Business Enterprise and Certified Business Expenditure Acts

Councilmember David Grosso’s opening remarks from the Committee on Business and Consumer Affairs hearing on three bills that will amend the Small Business Enterprise and Certified Business Expenditure Acts:

Thank you, Chairman Orange for holding this hearing.

Today, we are here to discuss bills that would amend the Small Business Enterprise (SBE) and Certified Business Expenditure Acts.  I do not believe that the current set-up is working well for our city businesses or agencies.  I am not suggesting we disband the SBE program, I am suggesting that we reform how it is being implemented.  I believe we can address helping small businesses in more creative ways that will help them thrive as opposed to forcing agency’s to do business with them.

Last December when the Committee held a roundtable on these issues we analyzed the Auditor’s September 2013 report that provided a substantial amount of basic data regarding each agency’s budget, the required SBE amount to be spent, and how much the agency actually did spend during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2013.  We are able to capture which agencies are in compliance and which ones are not.  And as I stated last year, from what I can tell, there is a pattern of inconsistency from agency to agency, quarter to quarter, year to year.

I believe our system is too inflexible.  Rather than spurring growth, it pushes businesses out of the District because they do not want to deal with the maze of requirements for certification.  I do not believe that we can demand that each agency meet an often intangible goal without looking at a more holistic approach that supports small businesses without over burdening government agencies. 

Creating more SBEs by expanding the scope of RFP requirements, broadening the exceptions in the Code for who qualifies as a CBE or SBE, or making blanket percentage requirements on agencies is not the answer.  

As we know, the SBE program is not unique to D.C.  Across the country, hundreds of cities and counties have small business enterprise programs in place.  Each program is different, but common themes of success include established city-wide participation and individual contracting goals. This year, the Small Business Policy Project studied the concerns of over 200 stakeholders.   In February, the project published their findings in a report that includes over 50 recommendations for improving the environment for small businesses in the District of Columbia.  Many of their recommendations are relatively simple and can be done soon.  For example we can do three things:

First we need to improve the environment for small businesses who want to operate in the city.  We can expand their resources and technical assistance funding that helps to provide support at each stage in a business’s “lifecycle.”  If there is better technical assistance then we can measure outcomes and track a business’s long term success.

Second, we need to give the small business community a voice and listen to that voice. Let small businesses express their needs and have a platform where they are heard.  For example, a small business advocate or ombudsman would help the business community to advocate for their needs and concerns.  

And lastly, we can work to improve the access to information and communication with small businesses.  If DCRA and DSLBD can streamline their processes and share more data than small businesses can thrive here.  Also, if we allow for the delay in licensing fees or other major hurdles like retail space and other economic hardships that emerging small businesses must face than we are truly helping them survive.

I would like to hear today if DSLBD would be able to implement these bills, if they truly address SBE and CBE compliance, and if there aren’t better ways to assist each agency to meet SBE goals and how they engage with stakeholders to raise participation.

I would like to work together with you, Chairman Orange and the Committee to find ways that government can better assist small businesses so that they can thrive in D.C. and so that SBE’s can be involved in all of our contracts. 

Comment

Comment

Congresswoman Norton looking for long-term unemployment stories

The Office of Congresswoman Norton is still looking for D.C. residents who can tell their story of long term unemployment and the struggle of looking for a job, at a community roundtable entitled “An Unemployment Speak Out” on Wednesday, October 29th from 6:30PM to 8:30PM. We are looking for long-term unemployed residents, particularly those hurt by the cut-off of long-term unemployment benefits, as well as recent college graduates looking for employment. 

Submit stories and commentary to Tristan.Breaux@mail.house.gov

Comment

Comment

David Grosso doesn’t want to take cops’ guns. At least not all of them.

Mike DeBonis, the Washington Post, October 9, 2014

First things first: D.C. Council member David Grosso would like to assure you he has no plans to introduce a bill banning police officers in the District from carrying guns.

But Grosso’s offhand comments, aired at a Wednesday night D.C. Council hearing on policing practices, have certainly stirred up the conversation he says he wanted to start.

“My staff won’t let me tell you that I think we ought to get rid of guns in this city, and that police shouldn’t have guns, so I’m not going to tell you that,” he said at Howard University to a smattering of applause. “I think we have to reimagine the way that we relate to one another, across the board, and that includes [the D.C. police department].”

Grosso’s comments went from his mouth to tweets to the Associated Press wire and on to the realm of conservative media, where his offhand remark has summarized thusly: “DC Councilman Wants To Take Cops’ Guns.”

“I’m not introducing any legislation,” Grosso (I-At Large) said in a Thursday phone interview. “I’m just trying to have a conversation beyond the knee jerk of what people say all the time.”

That means, he said, challenging the orthodoxy of assuming that all cops need to carry firearms at all times: “When you have a gun, it changes the dynamic completely. If we had a police force that could be trained to de-escalate situations without a gun like in other countries, I think we’d be in a better place. … Call me a radical, but I’m trying to change things in our city.”

Grosso said he is struck by the lack of trust that exists between D.C. police and the city’s residents, as evidenced by testimony at Wednesday’s hearing and his own conversations with some of his neighbors, who he says have “no relationship to speak of” with police.

“We’re not going to increase that level of trust unless we change things dramatically,” he said. “What I’m saying is, here’s a dramatic suggestion. It’s been tossed around historically, but let’s have an honest conversation about guns. … Violence begets violence, I believe that. I bought into that a long time ago.”

Gwendolyn Crump, a police spokeswoman, declined to comment on Grosso’s suggestion.

Grosso suggested that, for instance, among officers assigned to a particular patrol area, only some might carry weapons. “I’m not naive here. I don’t believe there will be a time when there will be no guns,” he said. “But let’s try and find a way to reduce the number of incidents when you have a police officer who is trying to relate to the community in a positive way but has a gun on their belt. … Maybe no guns isn’t the answer, but we have to come up with something, and I think we’re smart enough to do this.”

The applause that Grosso’s comments generated Wednesday would suggest he might find a sympathetic audience among the liberal District populace. But perhaps not, given that the city is barely a year removed from a devastating mass shooting, where D.C. beat cops were among the first to respond.

Presented with the classic bad-guy-with-a-gun, active shooter scenario, Gross was unfazed. “We ought to legislate and create policies based on the overwhelming examples of what happens every day, not on extreme cases,” he said.

Comment

Comment

D.C. Council Votes To Further Change City's Marijuana Laws

Matt Cohen, DCist, Oct 7, 2014

With marijuana possession decriminalized to nothing more than a simple fine if you're caught with an ounce or less, the lingering questions is: what becomes of those with marijuana charges on their record before the law came into effect?

Under a bill that Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) introduced last fall, the criminal records for District residents convicted of non-violent marijuana-related crimes would be sealed. During today's legislative meeting, Grosso's bill unanimously passed the first vote on the bill.

"Our criminal justice system has relied on vengeance and punishment," Gross said during a brief reading of the bill before it came to vote. He explained how this bill is a step in the right direction for expunging the records of those whose lives have been made harder because of a non-violent marijuana-related drug charge. Thus, all those with minor, non-violent marijuana charges on their record can have their court records sealed for good.

Additionally, the Council also voted to approve a bill to permanently change the District's medical marijuana laws. In August, Mayor Vince Gray quietly signed temporary legislation into law that allows doctors to prescribe medical marijuana to patients as they see fit, rather than limiting it to a short list of qualifying conditions. The Council voted to make the temporary bill permanent.

Of course, D.C.'s marijuana laws could be radically changed come November, as residents will be able to vote on a ballot initiative—Initiative 71—that would legalize the possession, consumption, and cultivation of small amounts of marijuana.

Comment

Comment

D.C. Moves Towards Sealing Records Of Residents Arrested For Pot Offenses

By: Martin Austermuhle, WAMU, October 7, 2014

On July 17, the possession of small amounts of marijuana was decriminalized in D.C. After that day, being caught with anything less than an ounce of pot would get you a $25 fine. But if you were stopped by police before that, you faced far worse: arrest, possible jail time and a criminal record.

A bill passed by the D.C. Council today seeks to remedy that. Under the bill, residents arrested for offenses that have since been decriminalized or legalized — like marijuana possession — can petition to have their records sealed.

"If we're going to decriminalize or legalize marijuana under the guise of social justice, we have to allow people who are disproportionately impacted by the old laws to go back to living their old lives without consequence or stigma," says Council member David Grosso (I-At Large), who sponsored the measure.

The bill is limited to residents arrested for non-violent marijuana offenses, and they cannot have a prior arrests or convictions. Grosso says that some 20,000 residents arrested for marijuana-related offenses over the last decade could benefit from the new law, and will not have to admit to having had a record when applying for a job or seeking housing.

As currently written, the bill will apply to residents arrested for possessing less than an ounce of marijuana, provided it happened before July 17. But if a marijuana legalization ballot initiative is approved by voters in November, it will extend to possession of less than two ounces and the growing of up to six plants, as well as possession of drug paraphernalia.

The D.C. Council has in the past approved record-sealing provisions, but this bill — the first of its kind in the nation, according to Grosso's office — eases the process of petitioning for a record to be sealed and expands the circumstances under which a record will be sealed, including residents who were arrested, charged or convicted. Prior record-sealing laws were limited to convictions.

"Our criminal justice system has too often focused on vengeance and punishment," says Grosso, who tied his bill to a measure passed earlier this year that limits when an employer can asked a job applicant about any past arrests or convictions.

The bill was approved unanimously on first reading, and still faces a second vote and congressional approval before becoming law.

Comment

Comment

DC considers bill to encourage urban farming on vacant lots

urbanfarm-11410716110.jpg

On a field in Brookland just off Fourth Street NE where priests used to play soccer, Gail Taylor harvests an ear of Bear Island Flint corn and peels back a husk to find a worm nibbling at the pomegranate-red kernels. Without hesitating, she executes the pest with the quick slice of a knife and reaches for the next ear.

“We have a bit of a corn worm problem,” she says casually. “Usually I just kill them with my hands.”

The two-acre plot, with its urban soundtrack of cicadas, cars and church bells, is Taylor’s farm, courtesy of the Catholic order housed there, which lets her work the land for free.

Since 2012, the 36-year-old ex-policy activist has been using the skills she learned from five years on an organic farm in Maryland to grow crops such as eggplants and tomatoes. She would like to be able to sell her fresh, locally grown produce to neighborhood residents, but doing so would trigger a dramatic hike in the tax assessment for the property. Likely, the nonprofit Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate would be forced to end the noncommercial contract that allows Taylor to use the land.

Taylor has turned her frustration into action, and with the help of American University’s law clinic and council member David Grosso (I-At Large) has drafted a bill to change the city tax regulations that make it difficult for urban farmers to create economically viable businesses.

“The goal is not to get rich,” says Taylor, who gives away the food she grows and pays her farming expenses with her own money and donations. “I’m pushing so the work that we do will be recognized more officially, so that we won’t have to struggle so much to do something so good.”

The city has a number of vacant lots that urban agriculture proponents say could be put to use growing food. But the District encourages development by taxing vacant and blighted land at higher rates, providing little incentive for private land-owners and aspiring farmers to strike leasing deals. Nonprofit groups, such as religious groups, risk losing tax exemptions if they lease their land for commercial purposes.

Echoing similar initiatives in cities such as San Francisco and Baltimore, the D.C. Urban Farming and Food Security Act would change that. The bill outlines a plan to connect publicly and privately owned vacant land with urban farming ventures in an effort to provide more sustainable and healthy food options for surrounding communities and to transform unused and sometimes unsafe areas into productive green spaces.

Introduced in February, the bill offers private owners a substantial property tax deduction — 50 percent — if they lease the land for farming. Supporters said they hope to see the bill extend tax-exempt status for commercial urban farms on land owned by nonprofit groups and religious entities.

The bill also encourages the farms to donate to District food banks or shelters by creating a “farm to food donations” tax credit.

“We have a ton of room,” said Grosso, who introduced the bill with Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward 3) and Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6). The bill has gained substantial support in the council with Chairman Phil Mendelson (D), Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5) and mayoral candidate Muriel Bowser (D-Ward 4) joining as co-sponsors.

“If we could create more food in the city, we could decrease the cost and increase the quality,” Grosso said. “If you pick a tomato in Ecuador and ship it to the States . . . if you pick that tomato in Ward 8, it’s better for you and better for the environment and better for the people eating it.”

At a public hearing in June, the city’s Department of General Services, which is responsible for city land, identified 16 public lots that could be used for urban agriculture. Many vacant lots are located in the same communities that could benefit the most from access to fresh food.

Taylor conceived the idea for the bill after running into obstacles trying to find land for her farm a few years ago. She consulted with the free law clinic at American University to research and help draft the legislation, eventually seeking out Grosso because she knew he had worked on his parents’ organic farm in Loudoun County, Va.

For the Brookland plot, Taylor cannot make any commercial transaction without triggering an estimated $50,000 property tax hike for the owners. She donates nearly all of the harvest to local charities and to volunteers who work on the farm. She funds the seeds, compost, tools and equipment with a combination of donations and her savings.She also works part-time at a yoga studio.

The Urban Farming Act stipulates that the leases must be for a minimum of three years so farmers have enough time to make their investment profitable. The bill doesn’t address what would happen if a developer purchased the lot after a farm becomes established in a community.

A provision also requires applicants for vacant city land to have at least one year of farming experience and to be a District resident for at least one year. The fiscal impact of the bill on the city has not been estimated, Grosso said, but the council has budgeted money to create a new food policy director.

Baltimore piloted a program in 2011 that leased vacant public lots to two farms and has almost completed the process for a third. It is also considering a tax incentive to entice private landholders to follow suit. The new farms have rapidly established themselves, Beth Strommen, the director of Baltimore’s office of sustainability, said in an e-mail.

“The urban agriculture movement is still very new, and best practices are changing and developing,” Strommen said. “Some things, like zoning and tax issues, do need to be matters of law, and so we’ve crafted legislation where necessary.”

The District bill is one of the first municipal acts in the country to be released on an online platform for the public to comment on and annotate legislation. The OpenGov Foundation, a District-based nonprofit group trying to bring public engagement online, worked with Grosso to release the act on its ­MadisonDC site. Grosso added comments from the site, some suggesting vacant land be made available as community gardens, to the official record at the public hearing.

Lawmakers could also consider making a new tax rate specifically for urban agriculture and support zoning that would allow industrial spaces to be used for hydroponics and vertical farming, said Lillie Rosen, food access director of nonprofit group DC Greens.

“Urban agriculture is already starting to be part of the urban development in D.C. This helps us be able to actualize it,” Rosen said.

As she uproots weeds, wearing old jeans and her less expensive, dark-framed “farming glasses,” Taylor says she remains as driven to produce fresh food for the city she loves as the day she started.

“The first thing we planted were little tomato seedlings, and we didn’t have anything,” Taylor recalls. “There was nothing. We didn’t have a hose, hadn’t hooked up water. So I checked the forecast for a day when it might rain, and we planted and crossed our fingers. As soon as we were done and packed, the clouds opened up and it poured. I’ve never been happier to be absolutely drenched riding my bike home.”

Comment

Comment

Grosso Announces Hearing on 'Clean Hands' Bill

For Immediate Release

September 18, 2014

Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

(202) 724-8105

Grosso Announces Hearing on 'Clean Hands' Bill

Washington, D.C. -- Today, the Committee on Government Operations will hold a hearing on the Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014, a bill which Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) introduced with his elections reforms package.  The hearing will be held at 11:00 am in room 120 of the John A. Wilson Building, located at 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.

The Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014, if enacted, will require that all candidates for elected office obtain a "clean hands" certification from the Office of Campaign Finance prior to qualifying for the ballot for any election.  Currently, the Board of Elections can fine candidates who fail to comply with the rules and procedures in our election laws. However, there have been many cases where fines have gone unpaid because the Board of Elections has little enforcement authority. "By requiring candidates to certify that they have clean hands, particularly when it comes to their prior campaigns, we will encourage our candidates to be more attentive to the elections and campaign finance rules," Grosso said.

Councilmember Grosso has introduced a series of election and campaign finance reform bills in an effort to engage the residents in the political process. Those bills include the Public Financing of Political Campaigns Amendment Act of 2013, a bill to allow candidates to run for office on a blend of small contributions from individuals and limited public funds; the "Instant Runoff Voting Amendment Act of 2014," a bill to allow voters to rank candidates in the order of their choice and the candidates with the least number of votes would be eliminated; and the "Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014," a bill to allow qualified registered voters the opportunity to change their party affiliation through Election Day.

Each bill has been referred to the Committee on Government Operations. 

### 

Comment

Comment

Grosso’s Criminal Justice Bills Pass through Committee

For Immediate Release

September 18, 2014

Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

(202) 724-8105

Grosso’s Criminal Justice Bills Pass through Committee

Washington, D.C. -- Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large), a strong advocate of criminal justice reform, is pleased to announce that two major bills that he introduced, the Record Sealing for Decriminalized and Legalized Offenses Amendment Act of 2014 and the Repeal of Prostitution Free Zones and Drug Free Zones Amendment Act of 2014 passed in the Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. Both bills were noticed to be placed on the legislative agenda for the upcoming legislative meeting on Tuesday, September 23, 2014.

The Record Sealing for Decriminalized and Legalized Offenses Amendment Act of 2014 was introduced as a companion bill to Grosso’s legislation to tax and regulate marijuana in the District of Columbia. The bill will ensure that residents with a non-violent misdemeanor or felony possession of marijuana as their only prior criminal history can have their records for those charges or arrests sealed by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and the Superior Court. Furthermore, employers will be prohibited from asking if an applicant previously had their records expunged or sealed. “For perspective, there were 20,000 arrests in the District of Columbia over a 10 year period for a non-violent possession of marijuana. This will help thousands of D.C. residents. The legislation is also critical to addressing barriers to employment, housing and education,” said Grosso.

The Repeal of Prostitution Free Zones and Drug Free Zones Amendment Act of 2014 will reverse the current rulemaking allowing MPD to declare a particular location as a prostitution free zone for a 20-day period. A task force of experts who investigated MPD’s handling of hate crimes reported that transgender women and women of color expressed that MPD officers view and treat them as criminals. “Repeal of the prostitution free zones is long overdue,” says Grosso. “The prostitution free zones are a gateway to racial profiling. The repeal of these particular zones is a matter of justice and protecting communities that are heavily impacted.” The legislation was expanded to also repeal the Anti-Loitering/Drug Free Zone Act of 1996. Since the language creating prostitution free zones and the Drug Free Zone Act are nearly identical, the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety believed that both laws are likely unconstitutional.

Note: Both bill titles as introduced were Record Sealing for Non-Violent Marijuana Possession Act of 2013 and Repeal of Prostitution Free Zones Amendment Act of 2014.

Comment

Comment

Allies in Love & Justice: A Conversation with David Grosso and Serra Sippel

Interview by Tiffany Mott-Smith, September 15, 2014 in Tagg Magazine

IMG_3562.JPG

Earlier this moth, Tagg had the opportunity to sit down with Councilmember David Grosso and Executive Director of the Center for Health and Gender Equality, Serra Sippel.

Both Grosso and Sippel were raised in the D.C. metropolitan area and also happen to be husband and wife. This power couple and awe-inspiring allies have been advocating for the rights of others for over 20 years. They both seem to not only be ready, but also eager to keep that trend going.

They discuss their social justice journey, as well as how their partnership and politics are as much professional as they are personal.

What made you seek out careers in social justice?
David:
My mom is a social activist and has been her whole life. She raised me that way. She lives in an alternative community now in Petworth, near where I grew up. I’ve bailed my mom out of jail many times! Even when I was bartending she was pushing me and asking, “Are you doing your part to improve the life for others?” She’s always challenged me to do what I could to try to make the world a better place.

Serra: I was raised feminist and have always been pushed to think about equality and inequality. Even growing up Catholic and seeing women not being allowed to be priests made me think. I studied in Spain for a year at the time people were organizing around liberation theology and addressing how poverty affects women. I’d made up my mind to go to South America next, but I realized I don’t need to leave the United States to work with the poor. I knew social justice was going to be my life.

How has the battle for LGBT equality informed your politics?
Serra:
It’s been very personal for us, especially in Indiana when we were in school and having friends who were lesbian and gay, and seeing the discrimination they faced even in their religious communities. Seeing so many of my friends not being able to be open just shocked me. The politics become personal when you see the hurt. We rejected marriage for a long-time because of it—we wanted to have our friends be a part of it. It just didn’t seem fair.

David: No matter what, when there are oppressed people, there is work to be done. I’ve learned so much from Serra and the work she’s done internationally. She taught me that you have to recognize individual rights and a person’s needs. When you get into a position of power like I am, or get into a position of strength like Serra is, you have to advocate for your friends. You have to advocate for everyone.

How has your relationship informed your work?
Serra:
Our work is actually how we met. We were in Texas working for a homeless shelter and transitional facility for women and children. I was already living there with the families. It was a group of nuns and I facilitating the programming. I actually picked him up from the airport when he arrived and I was a little wary having a man in our space like that. I was concerned it would disturb the safe space we’d created, but he actually was great with the families.

David: I was brought on through the Brethren Volunteer Service to coordinate construction projects for the facility and work with the children’s program. Serra was the one who convinced me to go to college in the first place. That’s how I ended up at Earlham College.

Can you tell us a little about the work projects and initiatives you’re working on?
David:
Our office has been doing a lot of work on eliminating prostitution free zones. They target trans people in a way that is unfair, unconstitutional, and inhumane. It was a plan of mine to get on the council and undo them. It was an uphill battle because some of the council members I respect the most were the ones advocating the practice. But fortunately, the District Attorney ruled them unconstitutional, so we drafted legislation to get them repealed altogether. Next, we’re looking at drug free zones and other loitering laws that can be a real violation of human rights.

Serra: At the Center for Health and Gender Equality, we focus our advocacy with congress because they control the appropriations with regard to international family planning, maternal health, and HIV/AIDS. On the executive side, we work to influence the policies that guide the spending of that money. When I came into my position it was during the Bush administration, and they were exporting their reproductive rights policies. Among other things, these left out most lesbians and individuals assigned female at birth. In 2011, we were able to convince the Obama administration to institute more inclusive comprehensive prevention policies.

How do you stay grounded professionally and personally?
Serra:
We enjoy one another’s company. But, we like to work hard as well. We also don’t have children; so the most we have to juggle are the dogs.

David: We start every morning together with a cup of coffee and a good old-fashioned paper. Every minute we have together is a good time. I don’t think I could do this work without Serra. We’re one another’s accountability person.

Comment

Comment

What We're Reading: September 12, 2014

Final edition of the 2014 summer recess--hearings and votes start again next week.

D.C. is the Wild West when enforcing tickets for traffic violators, audit finds | Ashley Halsey,

September 9, 2014

On Monday, the D.C. inspector general issued a report that portrays the District as the “Wild West of traffic enforcement” when compared to neighboring jurisdictions. A look back at the nearly 2.5 million parking and traffic tickets in fiscal year 2013 finds that many drivers got speeding tickets for violations they don’t commit and for vehicles they’ve never owned.

Shackling D.C. juvenile offenders should not be routine | Editorial Board, September 9, 2014

No matter their age or the nature of offense, juveniles in the District are shackled when they are brought before judges in D.C. Superior Court by both the U.S. Marshals Service and the city’s Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services. We agree with the Editorial Board, “a change is in order.”

#WhyIStayed: She saw herself in Ray Rice’s wife, Janay, and tweeted about it. So did thousands of others. | Sarah Kaplan, September 9, 2014

#WhyIStayed, is yet another powerful example of social media bringing communities together. If you were ever interested in just a glimmer of what domestic violence survivors and victims have gone through, check out that hashtag on Twitter.

The Rise of the SWAT Team in American Policing | Clyde Haberman, September 7, 2014

The NY Times examines the increasing role of SWAT teams in policing American cities and towns. They have been the principal beneficiaries of the military equipment the Department of Defense has been transferring to local law enforcement. As you can imagine, the rise of SWAT now being used to deliver drug warrants or even execute eviction notices has altered the way police and the public interact.

Minneapolis schools ban suspensions of youngest students | Alejandra Matos, September 5, 2014

The Superintendent of Minneapolis public schools has banned the suspension of the district’s prekindergarten, kindergarten, and first-grade students for nonviolent behavior. The moratorium comes after the suspensions for kindergartners through fourth grade students jumped 32 percent in the past year.

The Afghan Girls Who Live as Boys | Jenny Nordberg, September 8, 2014

In a system where gender segregation is among the strictest in the world, families in Afghanistan have started to raise their daughters as sons. “The health workers say that families who disguise their daughters in this way can be rich, poor, educated, or uneducated, or belong to any of Afghanistan’s many ethnic groups. The only thing that binds the bacha posh girls together is their families’ need for a son in a society that undervalues daughters and demands sons at almost any cost.”

MRAPs And Bayonets: What We Know About The Pentagon’s 1033 Program | NPR, September 2, 2014

NPR obtained data from the Pentagon on every military item sent to local, state and federal agencies through the Pentagon’s Law Enforcement Support Office –known as the 1033 program—for the past eight years. They’ve made the data set available to the public and the findings are alarming.

DC Parking Study Proposes Rules that Change from Neighborhood to Neighborhood | Lark Turner, September 3, 2014

A new report issued by the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) last week outlines DDOT’s plans for the future of parking in the District. Interesting approach being proposed by the agency.

Teach for America has faced criticism for years. Now it’s listening—and changing | Dana Goldstein, September 5, 2014

For years, TFA has faced criticism for the relatively little training it provided to Corps members before sending them to the classroom. They did evolve over the years, improving how the organization trains Corps members to teach. But the core quick-prep, short-commitment model did not budge. Until now.

In D.C., a 13-year-old piano prodigy is treated as a truant instead of a star student | Petula Dvorak, September 8, 2014

Truancy is certainly an issue in the District that deserves oversight and consideration. Research shows that attendance is important to student learning. Dvorak takes a look, however, at how DCPS’ enforcement of truancy may be a bit subjective based on the zip code of the school. DCPS has responded.

How an Innovative Nonprofit Uses $700 to Prevent Families From Becoming Homeless | Scott Keyes, September 8, 2014

ThinkProgress takes a look at the Boston-based nonprofit, HomeStart, which acts as a middleman between a tenant and landlord when the tenant is unable to pay their rent. HomeStart covers the rent and then helps set up a feasible payment installment plan for the tenant if the landlord agrees not to evict.

In D.C., Most Gunshot Happen Near Schools | J.B. Wogan, September 3, 2014

A new study by The Urban Institute uses gunshot-detection technology instead of police reports to track gun violence during school hours. Of the gunshots fired during school year 2011-12, about 54 percent occurred within 1,000 feet of a school. What impact is that having on kids?

#CosmoVotes: How We Decided Which Midterm Candidates Are the Best for Women | Cosmopolitan Magazine Editors, September 8, 2014

Cosmopolitan, an international magazine for women, has begun to endorse candidates for the first time ever. The will be announcing endorsements every Tuesday until Election Day, November 4. Certainly an interesting development when it comes to the women’s voting bloc.

Comment

Comment

D.C. Council Members Grosso & Wells Join the Free Law Founders

D.C. Council Members Grosso & Wells

Join the Free Law Founders

Leading Open Government Elected Officials in Our Nation’s Capital Join Nationwide Coalition Reinventing U.S. Lawmaking for the Internet Age

September 11, 2014

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Free Law Founders (FLF) today announced that two new municipal open government leaders have joined the coalition: D.C. Council Members David Grosso and Tommy Wells.  Grosso and Wells are at the vanguard of modern, accessible District government, from collaborating with their constituents online to build smarter city laws with MadisonDC, to breaking down the barriers between residents and their laws with DCdecoded.  They join municipal elected officials NYC Council Member Ben Kallos, San Francisco Supervisor Mark Farrell and Chicago City Clerk Susana Mendoza in the FLF, and will assist its work to improve how democracy works for citizens living in our increasingly Internet-based society.

“Promoting an open and transparent government is among my top priorities as a lawmaker,” said D.C. Councilmember David Grosso. “I am pleased to join the Free Law Founders and support this national movement to make the legislative process accessible and accountable to all. Along with ethics and electoral reforms that I am pursuing, I believe open government efforts are critical to enriching our democracy and engaging residents within the community.”

"I am thrilled to join this nationwide coalition of local leaders working to make government information and data more accessible to the public,” said D.C. Council Member Tommy Wells.  “Municipal governments are historically inefficient and paper-based; they exclude citizens from playing any meaningful role. Through innovative tools, like MadisonDC and DCdecoded, we can now educate District residents, collect feedback and engage citizens in the legislative process from the ideation stage through successful passage. As a Free Law Founder, I'm excited to connect with government leaders across the country and to share ideas. We can learn from one another's experiences rather than reinvent the wheel."

"Just months after starting, we are pleased to welcome two Founders, DC Council Members David Grosso and Tommy Wells, who are committed to being free law leaders in their legislature,” said Free Law Founder Co-Chair, New York City Council Member Ben Kallos.  “Part of our mission has been to bring the free and open source model to government, so that innovation from one Founder can be replicated in other cities. I look forward to working with Council Members Grosso and Wells to expand to cities nationwide."

D.C. Council Member David Grosso

A native Washingtonian, Grosso was elected to the Council of the District of Columbia as an at-large councilmember on November 6, 2012 to represent residents in all eight wards. David brings a wealth of experience having worked with Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton as her chief Counsel and former D.C. Councilmember Sharon Ambrose, in addition to his experience in the private sector. David is committed to continuing school reform efforts, improving health outcomes throughout the city, addressing inequities within the criminal justice system, and enhancing job opportunities by supporting a robust successful workforce development and public higher education system. David has also pushed for good governance, including sweeping ethics reform, transparency and open government, and strengthening civic engagement. He helped pilot a collaborative legislation platform, the Madison Project, in D.C. and is very supportive of the Council’s efforts to engage residents in the legislative process, such as the new Decoded D.C. website and the new Legislative Information Management System.

D.C. Council Member Tommy Wells

In just six years since joining the D.C. Council in January 2006, Tommy Wells has won support throughout the District for his vision of a livable and walkable city for all. He is a passionate advocate for innovative solutions, and D.C.’s leading voice for progressive change.

Tommy started his Washington career in 1983 as a social worker in the D.C. foster care system.  In 1991, he took the helm of the D.C. Consortium for Child Welfare, where he was a force for creating neighborhood based-family service collaboratives that coordinate the delivery of city and nonprofit resources. During his 15 years with the Consortium, Tommy also served as an ANC Commissioner from 1994 to 2000 and a member of the D.C. Board of Education, representing Wards 5 and 6, from 2000 to 2006.

Since joining the DC Council in January 2007, Tommy has been a tireless advocate for smart growth and social justice. He spearheaded efforts to ensure that transit prioritized connecting neighborhoods to give DC residents access to jobs, instead of just moving commuters in and out of the city. He led the way in establishing the Housing First program, a proven way to get homeless people back on track by providing a stable place to live.

Currently, Tommy chairs the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety. As Chair, he has championed landmark legislation to decriminalize marijuana possession and “ban the box” in private sector hiring, giving returning citizens equal opportunities for success.

Tommy is the former chair of the board for Jan's Tutoring House and the previous chair of the Local Government Advisory Committee for the Chesapeake Bay. He graduated from the Columbus School of Law at Catholic University in 1991 and earned a master's degree in social work from the University of Minnesota in 1983. Since 1988 he has been married to Barbara Wells, a writer and arts enthusiast who is a tutor for Jan's Tutoring House and a judge for the Helen Hayes Awards.

Contacts

-       Julia Robey Christian, D.C. Council Member Tommy Wells, 202-724-8063, JChristian@DCcouncil.us

-       Dionne Calhoun, D.C. Council Member David Grosso,

         202-724-8105, dcalhoun@DCcouncil.us

-       Seamus Kraft, Executive Director, The OpenGov Foundation, 760-659-0631, seamus@opengovfoundation.org

-       Sarah Anders, NYC Council Member Ben Kallos,

         617-281-0447, sanders@benkallos.com

About the Free Law Founders

Citizens, technologists and public officials working together to transform state & local lawmaking for the 21st Century

The Free Law Founders is a nation-wide, collaborative effort open to all people who want to improve how laws and legislation are produced and presented to citizens of American states and cities. Our goal is to modernize how democracy works in the United States from the ground up. To get there, we’re creating open source tools and open data formats government workers need to get their jobs done efficiently, effectively and accountably. 

Click here to join the Free Law Founders!

###

Comment

Comment

Prioritizing Mental Health & Substance Abuse Treatment

The District of Columbia has a fairly strong healthcare delivery system, particularly for children.  We also rank among the top jurisdictions that provide health insurance coverage for the majority of our residents.  Unfortunately, our strengths in the physical health coverage arena have not translated into increased access to and use of behavioral health services.  This is troubling considering that residents with serious mental illnesses are known to have a life expectancy that is 25 years shorter than the residents without such mental illnesses.

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) 2013 Health Barometer, 23,000 D.C. adults experienced serious thoughts of suicide between 2011 and 2012.  Additionally during this timeframe, 14,000 adults were identified as suffering from a serious mental illness.  Nationally, it is estimated that 1 in 4 adults will experience some mental illness in their lifetime (i.e. depression, etc.) unfortunately, a significant number of these individuals will not seek treatment.  The scope of this problem highlights the critical need to expand access to treatment and services for all residents.  This is particularly true when we look at our performance in treating children experiencing mental health or substance abuse problems. 

Between 2011 and 2012, 25% of middle and high school students self-reported symptoms of depression, while one in seven youth actually made a plan about how they would attempt suicide.  Annually, 10% of youth experience a severe mental health problem.  In addition to mental health challenges, national estimates for D.C. indicate that anywhere between 2,000 and 3,000 youth below the age of 17 are abusing or are dependent on alcohol and drugs.  Further, in 2013, 350 D.C. children were referred for substance abuse treatment, yet only an estimated 70 children completed the treatment program.

The picture is crystal clear—our residents need mental health and substance abuse services.  They need early preventative care that identifies their needs and treats them appropriately.  Reflecting on this problem in our city, this summer I took the opportunity to tour seven specialty mental health clinics and substance abuse providers across the city, as well as, Saint Elizabeth’s Hospital. 

During my tours, I learned about a wide range of treatment programs, including assertive community treatment (ACT).  ACT is a service delivery model that combines comprehensive psychiatric treatment with rehabilitation and includes the necessary support for persons with serious and persistent mental illness.  ACT team members see clients where they are, frequently making home visits and coordinating with a host of partners to provide high-quality services. 

I explored another critical program, trauma-informed care, on my tour of Community Connections.  Trauma-informed care programs recognize that many individuals suffering from mental illness and co-occurring substance abuse have experienced some sort of physical, sexual, mental or emotional trauma in their lifetime, necessitating a comprehensive look at the factors that have contributed to their mental illnesses. 

The trauma-informed care program was eye-opening because it reinforced the fragility of our circumstances.  Any life event, from the death of a loved one, the loss of a job, involvement in a car accident can be traumatic, leading to bouts of grief.  Falling into homelessness is a prime example of a trauma that could send any of us along a downward spiral and the city’s housing and homelessness crisis is well-known. 

Our housing challenges were further underscored as I visited Pathways to Housing, a provider that specializes in housing our mentally ill.  Pathways to Housing employs a “housing first” model, providing immediate, low-barrier access to permanent housing and then combining it with supportive treatment services.  The apartment homes are scattered throughout the city and while the program maintains an 85% retention rate, barriers persist.

For example, the D.C. Housing Authority (DCHA) provides vouchers to help pay for apartments across the city.  Due to rising rental prices however, many residents are being steered to properties located in Wards 7 and 8 because vouchers for those apartments cover the entire rental cost, with money left over—while, in more affluent sections of the city, the vouchers rarely cover even half of the rental cost.  Despite this challenge, Pathways to Housing continues to press forward and typically is able to house a person, from the point of entry into the program through housing placement, within three weeks.

While touring McClendon Center, I had the opportunity to observe a day services program, which enables those dealing with mental illnesses, primarily schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, to learn life skills to assist them in readjusting to life back in society.  Day services programs challenge participants to engage with others, learn about their illnesses and how to manage them and assist them in becoming advocates for themselves.  What struck me about this particular program is that while the service is often viewed as “glorified adult day care,” participants are less likely to be re-hospitalized, demonstrating that this treatment effort not only brings about long-term cost savings by reducing hospitalizations, but significantly improves a participant’s quality of life. 

During several of my visits I learned, in greater depth, about Health Homes, similar in concept to a patient-centered medical home, but with an explicit component addressing the delivery of addiction and substance abuse services.  The Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Health Home provision allows a state entity to define a vulnerable population, provide primary care integration and receive 90% Federal Financial Participation through Medicaid for two years, rather than the current 70%.  This program is important because people with serious mental illnesses have a greater number of medical problems, often caused by smoking or self-neglect, co-occurring substance use, or even the medications they take for their psychiatric illnesses.  Because mental health consumers often do not tend to these conditions, they continue to worsen and treatment becomes increasingly more costly.  For this reason, the integration of medical services into a mental health facility is critical.  In addition, it is also valuable to have mental health providers in the medical clinics.   Health Homes is necessary, which is why the District of Columbia is currently working to implement this model with a proposed start date in 2015.

For me, the most heartbreaking tour took place at a facility specializing in the treatment of children impacted by grief and trauma.  The Wendt Center employs the Resilient Scholars Program, which is currently available in 21 different schools (charter and DCPS) in D.C.  The program helps children cope with trauma, which is challenging because many of the students suffer from polytraumas, the occurrence of multiple traumas.  These students are burdened by poverty, the experience of violence in their home or community, and so much more.  Recognizing that the stress of all this weight sometimes manifests as physical pain, the Resilient Scholars Program helps students to identify where they are hurting and why they are hurting; helping them to develop healthy mechanisms to begin to heal.  Viewing the students’ artwork was painful.  To read about their daily struggles and view the images of violence they had drawn was overwhelming and highlighted the critical need for this type of program in all of our schools.  The District of Columbia’s increased emphasis on standardized testing is an added stressor but programs like this one can work to improve student performance by addressing their grief and trauma. 

A common thread across all of the mental health and substance abuse clinics was a fervent commitment to the humanization of mental illness.  This was never more apparent than at Saint Elizabeth’s.  Saint Elizabeth’s residents are treated with dignity.  Upon their admission they are no longer, “prisoners” or “patients,” they are simply individuals receiving care.  The facility provides “homes” where residents are housed in dormitory style living quarters and afforded the opportunity to participate in various programs and other outlets to include a Patient Advisory Council.  Further, those residents preparing to transition back into the community are equipped with life skills such as learning to cook, do laundry, and operate a computer. 

Perhaps the most interesting part of my Saint Elizabeth’s tour was that residents, those on the transitional therapy floor, are not quarantined off from staff but allowed to freely walk the halls and actively participate in their treatment.  At the new facility, residents are not stigmatized; they are not caged nor subjected to a prison inspired atmosphere but treated as whole human beings.  By the conclusion of my tour, I was impressed with the staff, the facility and the level of care provided.

In addition to the facilities mentioned, I also had the opportunity to tour Green Door, Catholic Charities and CATAADA House of Calvary Healthcare.  All of these tours left me with the sense that our city is moving in the right direction.  While our mental health providers are unsung heroes treating some of the most vulnerable among us, there is still work to do.  With the deinstitutionalization of mental health services in D.C., community mental health providers expanded significantly.  At the time, the supply of services met the demand; however, as time has worn on the demand for services continues to increase.  This has presented some challenges, especially for our youth, who find it increasingly more difficult to get treatment from qualified child psychiatrists due to their scarcity.  Additionally, as providers ready themselves for the ability to now bill Medicaid for substance abuse treatment, new concerns will arise. 

We have a significant number of residents, especially youth, who need services but are not getting treatment.  This cannot continue.  City agencies and the providers themselves must continue to reduce the stigma associated with mental illness and substance abuse and actively work to market and promote their services.  Our residents deserve the best treatment and it appears to me that we are providing it but those in need cannot take advantage of what they do not know about.  Mental illness and substance abuse issues affect us all.  The links between homelessness and mental illness as well as the mental illnesses of those that are incarcerated are well-studied.  For this reason, I made it a priority to not only visit our service providers but also a homeless shelter and the D.C. jail to better understand the full spectrum of these complexities.  The health and wellness of our residents is a priority for me and I will continue to advocate for quality services and work with D.C. agencies and providers to address the barriers that they face and promote the services they provide.

Comment

Comment

Paid Family Leave: Eight Weeks for District Government Employees

By Anne Robinson

In March, we published a blog post on the Fair Leave Act of 2014, introduced by Councilmember Grosso.  The legislation provided D.C. government employees up to six weeks of paid leave in connection with the birth, adoption, or fostering of a child, or the care of a family member who has a serious medical condition.   During this time, conversation was sparked across the country about the need for men to be more supported as fathers and policies that encourage women to stay in the workplace.  This was an area where D.C. could lead.

When the Mayor released his proposed FY2015 budget to the Council in April, we were pleased to read that he included language for a six week maternity or paternity leave for D.C. government employees.  This was a follow through on the promise he made during the State of the District speech in February and similar to the language in the Fair Leave Act, but the issue of a fiscal impact was still unclear.  

Throughout the budget process, we worked diligently with Chairman Kenyan McDuffie of the Committee on Government Operations and were successful in amending the Mayor’s Budget Support Act language to: expand the language to be for the care of any family member; increase the amount of time from six weeks to eight weeks; and to cite all references and definitions to the D.C. Family Medical Leave Act (DC FMLA) for consistency (see the bottom of this post for the language).  

The eight weeks of paid family leave policy for a qualifying District government employee will go into effect on October 1, 2014.  The Department of Human Resources (DCHR) is currently working on issuing a bulletin to each agency’s Human Resources advisors to inform them of the law and the leave certification process.  They are hopeful that it will be issued by mid-September, at which point employees can submit an application for the benefit for leave occurring on or after October 1. DCHR is also working on a draft rulemaking that will be open for a 30 day comment period in late fall.   The eight weeks of paid leave will count against the allotted 16 weeks in a 24 month period of unpaid leave that is currently given under the D.C. FMLA.  The bill has no fiscal impact because employees’ salaries are already allocated for on an annual basis, therefore this leave time will not require any extra funding. 

The paid family leave beginning on October 1 is a major step for the District of Columbia and we will eagerly track the implementation process and the success of this initiative.  Our work is not done until we can expand this benefit to all of our families in the District working outside of government employment.

As we began our research and collaboration with advocacy groups, it became clear that identifying a funding structure to provide paid family leave without creating a new source of revenue would be very difficult.  California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island each have paid family leave programs that were more easily implemented because of already existing state level payroll and income tax systems.  Other jurisdictions offer paid family leave through State Disability Insurance (SDI) funds and temporary disability laws. Unfortunately, the District of Columbia does not have structures like these in place to expand coverage to all residents.

Over the summer, advocates worked with the Department of Employment Services (DOES), in partnership with Mayor Gray, to apply to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) for a grant to study the feasibility of a paid family leave program in the District.  At the White House Summit on Working Families in June, President Obama announced that DOL’s Women’s Bureau and Employment and Training Administration will make $500,000 available for up to five grants.  If awarded this funding, D.C. would be able to assess various aspects of a paid family leave program by estimating the expected costs, benefits, and economic impact; evaluating different models for delivery; and provide an analysis of education and outreach needs. The results of the grant competition are expected early this fall.

There is a major shift happening in national policy and paid family leave is a topic that many organizations are focusing on to support women and families in the workplace. Our office will continue to explore the option for expansion of paid family leave, researching alternatives, having conversations with the business community about the effects of paid family leave on the private sector, and supporting other federal policies that might help us progress toward inclusive paid family leave.  This is an area where D.C. can lead, and we plan to!

If a D.C. government employee or HR advisor is seeking information about the law, please direct them to DCHR at (202) 442-9700. The agency has FMLA coordinators who will advise them.

*This post is part of an ongoing series of posts by Councilmember Grosso’s staff to support professional development. All posts are approved and endorsed by Councilmember Grosso.


Comment

Comment

Grosso Proposes Creating Separate Council Committee For Housing

By Sarah Anne Hughes, September 3, 2014, DCist.com

Councilmember David Grosso has proposed creating a separate Council committee for housing, saying it's "an important issue separate and apart from economic development."

"Regardless of changes in political leadership, creating and maintaining affordable housing in the District of Columbia must always be a top priority," Grosso and his legislative assistant Katrina Forrest said today in a blog post. "For this to happen, we must be willing to candidly discuss past policy failures, to improve on existing policies and to create better policies moving forward. ... D.C. has seen numerous housing initiatives started and stalled over the years. This reality necessitates a need for a comprehensive look at our housing policies and strategies to ensure that all D.C. residents have access to quality affordable housing."

The recommendation, one of several released today by the At-Large Councilmember, would remove housing oversight from the Committee on Economic Development, which is currently chaired by Ward 4 Councilmember Muriel Bowser.

"Creating a standalone Committee on Housing and Community Development will provide greater oversight of all housing related agencies including the Department of Housing & Community Development (DHCD), the District Housing Finance Agency (DCHFA), the District Housing Authority (DCHA) and others to ensure performance goals are being met and the creation and preservation of affordable housing is a top priority that is in line with all of the city’s housing strategies," Grosso and Forrest write. "Additionally, important aspects of the agencies responsible for providing services to the homeless will fall under the purview of this committee to ensure that the full spectrum of housing issues, from homelessness to homeownership, are prioritized.

Grosso's chief of staff says the Councilmember has not discussed the idea with Bowser or Council Chair Phil Mendelson. Request for comment from Bowser's office was not immediately returned.

Other recommendations include building a public housing database, as well as fee waivers and reductions for affordable housing development.

Comment